 |
- Introduction
- Letter: typical pre-1975 approach
- After 1975, drastically different approach
- IDEA
- FAPE - free appropriate public education
- IEP (Individualized Education Program)
- Order essential
- Legal compliance, educational utility
- IDEA mandates IEP as means to deliver FAPE
- IEPs must be both procedurally and substantively sufficient to provide FAPE
- Purposes of the IEP document and meetings
- Communication vehicle between parents and school
- Written commitment of resources
- Evaluation device
- Key ingredients central for developing and implementing IEPs
- Child's unique needs
- Special education and related services to meet needs
- Goals and objectives of services provided
- Necessary resources
- Extent of child's progress
- IEP Team membership and responsibilities
- Mandated members
- Parents or legal guardian
- Regular education teacher if applicable
- Special education teacher
- Individual to interpret evaluation results (not widely implemented)
- LEA representative
- Other individuals with special expertise
- When appropriate, the child with the disability
- For transition, the student and a representative from other agencies
- Responsibilities
- To review existing evaluation data, identify additional data needed
- To develop IEP
- To review and revise IEP
- To develop assessment plan to address behavior that led to suspension
- To review and modify existing behavioral intervention plan
- To determine alternative educational setting
- To conduct the manifestation determination review
- Required components of all IEPs
- Statement of child's present levels of educational performance
- Statement of measurable annual goals, including benchmarks, short-term objectives
- Statement of services and program modifications or support to be provided
- Explanation of extent to which child will not participate with non-disabled children
- Statements related to participation in assessment of student achievement
- Projected date for and details about services and modifications
- Statement about how progress will be measured and how parents will be informed
- Beginning at age 14, statements about transition services
- Access to the general curriculum
- General curriculum = curriculum used with non-disabled children
- Goals not needed for some parts of general curriculum
- If disability does not affect performance
- If only modifications or accommodations required
- Special education = specially designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet unique needs of a child with a disability
- Eli, an example
- To improve IEP quality, limit goals
- One for each distinct aspect of special education
- Include what special education instruction is being provided
- Include what special education instruction will enable child to do
- IEP goals are for special education services, not for general curriculum
- IEP addresses services to give special education student access to general curriculum
- Reading
- Following directions
- Paying attention
- Asking relevant questions
- Additional components and considerations
- Strengths of the child
- Parent concerns
- Required assistive technology
- Communication needs of child
- Initial or most recent evaluation
- Perhaps, positive behavior interventions, Braille, language and communication needs
- Extended school year (ESY) if needed for FAPE
- Minimizing paperwork and maximizing results
- Minimizing IEP paperwork
- Include only elements required by law
- Prioritize goals; include only most important
- IEP is minimum, not maximum
- Better management of paperwork
- Trained clerk, aide, volunteer
- Staff training - writing IEPs during meeting
- Eliminate preparation of "draft" IEPs
- Knowledge to deal with disagreements
- Maximizing results of IEP
- IEP accessible to all involved teachers and providers
- IEP shared with other school personnel without parental consent
- IEP written so that substitute/new teacher can see individual's needs
- IEP tells parents precisely what services child receives, results expected
- Technology and IEPs
- Word processing, database software to facilitate IEP work
- Software flexibility
- Caution about software programs requiring percentage figure as criteria
- Caution about using only goals and objectives found in software catalog
- Technology shouldn't sacrifice spirit of IDEA, letter of the law
|